UTILITARIANISM
Jeremy
Bentham
Even a small stone can cause ripples in the
water. Even a small amount of dust can hurt the eye. It is not about how little
things are. It is how it affects the entirety of the whole. As Jeremy Bentham
who advocated his philosophical view called utilitarianism, once said, "It
is vain to talk of the interest of the community, without understanding what is
the interest of the individual." An individual, thus, completes a
community. Without him, a community stands agape. It is indeed necessary to spare
time, effort, and knowledge in getting to know the individuals comprising the
community.
Throughout the ages, philosophy has sought to
answer the questions that humanity have been asking since the dawn of time.
Especially in the field of morality of what should be considered morally
acceptable or not. And today, I am going to talk about the philosophy pioneered
by Jeremy Bentham, which is utilitarianism. As an overview, let me suffice it
by saying that utilitarianism, as a philosophy, focuses mainly on the idea that
an action is deemed morally right or wrong depending on its effects Jeremy
Bentham, a leading theorist in Anglo-American philosophy of law and one of the
founders of utilitarianism, was born in Houndsditch, London on
February 15, 1748. He was the son and grandson of attorneys, and his early
family life was colored by a mix of pious superstition (on his mother's side)
and Enlightenment rationalism (from his father). Bentham lived during a time of
major social, political and economic change. The Industrial Revolution (with
the massive economic and social shifts that it brought in its wake), the rise
of the middle class, and revolutions in France and America all were reflected
in Bentham's reflections on existing institutions. In 1760, Bentham entered
Queen's College, Oxford and, upon graduation in 1764, studied law at Lincoln's
Inn. Though qualified to practice law, he never did so. Instead, he devoted
most of his life to writing on matters of legal reform—though, curiously, he
made little effort to publish much of what he wrote.
As for his philosophical views, Bentham's moral philosophy
reflects what he calls at different times "the greatest happiness
principle" or "the principle of utility"—a term which he borrows
from Hume. In adverting to this principle, however, he was not referring to
just the usefulness of things or actions, but to the extent to which these
things or actions promote the general happiness. Specifically, then, what is
morally obligatory is that which produces the greatest amount of happiness for
the greatest number of people, happiness being determined by reference to the
presence of pleasure and the absence of pain. Thus, Bentham writes, "By
the principle of utility is meant that principle which approves or disapproves
of every action whatsoever, according to the tendency which it appears to have
to augment or diminish the happiness of the party whose interest is in
question: or, what is the same thing in other words, to promote or to oppose
that happiness." And Bentham emphasizes that this applies to "every
action whatsoever" (Ch. 1). That which does not maximize the greatest
happiness (such as an act of pure ascetic sacrifice) is, therefore, morally
wrong. (Unlike some of the previous attempts at articulating a universal hedonism,
Bentham's approach is thoroughly naturalistic.)
First, Bentham says, the principle of utility is something to
which individuals, in acting, refer either explicitly or implicitly, and this
is something that can be ascertained and confirmed by simple observation. Indeed,
Bentham held that all existing systems of morality can be "reduced to the
principles of sympathy and antipathy," which is precisely that which
defines utility. A second argument found in Bentham is that, if pleasure is the
good, then it is good irrespective of whose pleasure it is. Thus, a moral
injunction to pursue or maximize pleasure has force independently of the
specific interests of the person acting. Bentham also suggests that individuals
would reasonably seek the general happiness simply because the interests of
others are inextricably bound up with their own, though he recognized that this
is something that is easy for individuals to ignore. Nevertheless, Bentham
envisages a solution to this as well. Specifically, he proposes that making this
identification of interests obvious and, when necessary, bringing diverse
interests together would be the responsibility of the legislator.
Finally, Bentham held that there are advantages to a moral
philosophy based on a principle of utility. To begin with, the principle of
utility is clear (compared to other moral principles), allows for objective and
disinterested public discussion, and enables decisions to be made where there
seem to be conflicts of (prima facie) legitimate interests. Moreover, in calculating
the pleasures and pains involved in carrying out a course of action (the
"hedonic calculus") there is a fundamental commitment to human
equality. The principle of utility presupposes that "one man is worth just
the same as another man" and so there is a guarantee that in calculating
the greatest happiness "each person is to count for one and no one for
more than one."
The "greatest happiness principle", or the principle
of utility, forms the cornerstone of all Bentham's thought. By
"happiness", he understood a predominance of "pleasure"
over "pain". Thus, Bentham wrote in The Principles of Morals and
Legislation:
Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign
masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to
do, as well as to determine what we shall do. On the one hand the standard of
right and wrong, on the other the chain of causes and effects, are fastened to
their throne. They govern us in all we do, in all we say, in all we think.
Bentham was a rare major figure in the history of philosophy to
endorse psychological egoism. As to religious values, however, while Hobbes was
an avowed Anglican, Bentham was a determined opponent of religion. Crimmins
observes: "Between 1809 and 1823 Jeremy Bentham carried out an exhaustive
examination of religion with the declared aim of extirpating religious beliefs,
even the idea of religion itself, from the minds of men."
Bentham suggested a procedure for estimating the moral status of
any action, which he called the Hedonistic or felicific calculus.
Utilitarianism was revised and expanded by Bentham's student John Stuart Mill.
In Mill's hands, "Benthamism" became a major element in the liberal
conception of state policy objectives.
I therefore conclude that Bentham's moral clearly reflects his
psychological view that the primary motivators in human beings are pleasure and
pain. Bentham admits that his version of the principle of utility is something
that does not admit of direct proof, but he notes that this is not a problem as
some explanatory principles do not admit of any such proof and all explanation
must start somewhere. But this, by itself, does not explain why another's
happiness—or the general happiness—should count. And, in fact, he provides a
number of suggestions that could serve as answers to the question of why we
should be concerned with the happiness of others.